Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb 24;90(6):1138–1143. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601662

Table 2. Relative 5-year survival of breast cancer patients by age group, TNM stage, histology, grade and treatment from univariate analysis, ORCC, 1994–1997.

  No. (%)a Relative survival (%)
Prognostic factor observations Rate 95% CIb
Age at diagnosis (years)      
 0–39 147 (6.7) 69.9 60.5–77.5
 40–49 448 (20.4) 84.2 79.3–88.1
 50–69 972 (44.3) 88.4 84.9–91.4
 70+ 625 (28.5) 81.3 74.9–86.2
 
TNM stagec      
 Stage I 812 (37.0) 96.0 92.7–97.8
 Stage II 843 (38.5) 85.6 81.7–88.7
 Stage III 155 (7.1) 59.2 47.9–68.9
 Stage IV 112 (5.1) 25.5 16.1–36.0
 
Histology type      
 Ductal carcinoma 1765 (80.5) 84.32 81.6–86.7
 Lobular carcinoma 233 (10.6) 91.02 81.0–95.9
 Others 194 (8.9) 76.65 67.7–83.4
 
Histologic gradec      
 G1 (well differentiated) 346 (15.8) 97.2 90.9–99.1
 G2 (moderately differentiated) 674 (30.8) 87.8 83.7–91.0
 G3 (poorly differentiated) 474 (21.6) 73.9 68.0–78.9
 
Treatmentc      
 Chemotherapy 38 (1.7) 46.2 25.2–64.8
 Radiotherapy 54 (2.5) 87.7 73.1–94.7
 Surgery 188 (8.6) 89.1 77.2–94.9
 Chemotherapy+radiotherapy 135 (6.2) 61.4 51.3–70.1
 Chemotherapy+surgery 396 (18.1) 82.1 75.8–86.9
 Radiotherapy+surgery 389 (17.8) 96.0 89.7–98.6
 Chemotherapy+radiotherapy+surgery 972 (44.3) 77.4 73.3–80.9
a

P-value of χ2 test for the changes in a variable structure was less than 0.0001 for each variable considered.

b

CI=confidence interval.

c

Unstaged (%)=12.3, ungraded=31.8 and untreated or unknown=0.9.