Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov 9;91(11):1887–1892. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602224

Table 5. Frequencies of women receiving an inadequate cervical smear test result who attended or did not attend for a repeat smear test within three months, and predictors of attendance (mean (s.d.), % (n)).

  Attenders (n=142) Nonattenders (n=34) Test statistics P-values
Age; in years: Mean (s.d.) 40.3 (12.8) 36.6 (12.1) t=1.528 0.128
Education: % (n)        
No qualifications 15 (22) 24 (8) χ2=3.221 0.2
GCSE, GCE (A and O levels) 42 (59) 50 (17) (df=2)  
Degree and higher education 42 (60) 26 (9)    
(Missing) 1 (1) 0    
         
Smear history: % (n)        
First smear 10 (14) 21 (7) χ2=3.005 0.083
Not first smear 89 (127) 79 (27) (df=1)  
Don't know 1 (1) 0    
         
State Anxiety: Mean (s.d.) 36.4 (12.2) 43.2 (15.8) t=2.575 0.011
         
Concern: Mean (s.d.) 8.6 (2.8) 8.9 (3.2) t=0.631 0.529
         
Perceived stressfulness about next smear test: Mean (s.d.) 3.4 (1.9) 4.1 (2.2) t=1.796 0.074
         
Satisfaction with information: 4-item scale: Mean (s.d.) 19.7 (5.3) 17.8 (6.7) t=1.787 0.076
         
Perceived risk of developing cervical cancer: % (n)a        
(f) Much higher than average 2 (3)      
(g) A bit higher than average 15 (22) 15 (5)    
(h) Same as average 68 (96) 68 (23) Z=0.899 0.369
(i) A bit lower than average 8 (12) 9 (3)    
(j) Much lower than average 4 (5) 9 (3)    
(Missing) 3 (4)      
a

Mann–Whitney ‘U’-test.

P-values reaching statistical significance (P<0.05) in bold.