Table 5. Relationship between ERα, ERβ and other histopathological variables.
Factor | ERα IHC | ERα RT–PCR | ERβIHC | ERβ RT–PCR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stage | low P=0.019 | low P=0.014 | n.s. | n.s. |
(MW) n=160 | (MW) n=127 | (CS, MW) n=138 | (CS, MW) n=127 | |
Grade | low P<0.0005 | low P<0.0005 | n.s. | n.s. |
(MW) n=160 | (MW) n=127 | (CS, MW) n=138 | (CS, MW) n=127 | |
Size | n.s. | n.s. | larger P=0.076* | larger P=0.025 |
(CS, MW) n=158 | (CS, MW) n=125 | (MW) n=136 | (MW) n=125 | |
Nodal status | negative P=0.048 | negative P=0.057 | n.s. | n.s. |
(CS) n=131 | (CS) n=108 | (CS) n=110 | (CS) n=108 | |
Lymphovascular Invasion | n.s. | n.s. | present P=0.067* | present P=0.043 |
(CS, MW) n=159 | (CS) n=126 | (CS) n=137 | (CS) n=126 | |
PgR | positive P<0.0005 | positive P<0.0005 | n.s. | positive P=0.056 |
(MW) n=146 | (CS) n=110 | (CS, MW) n=138 | (CS) n=110 | |
Ki67 | low P<0.0005 | low P<0.0005 | high P=0.034 | n.s. |
(MW) n=141 | (CS) n=108 | (MW) n=133 | (CS, MW) n=108 |
Statistical test used was chi-square (CS), Mann-Whitney (MW); n.s.=not significant.
using a cut-off of 60% positive cells for ERβ1.