Skip to main content
. 2008 May 26;9:245. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-245

Table 3.

Area under ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) values for Predikin and five comparable methods

Ser/Thr CMGC Tyr
Method AUC Sn % Sp % AUC Sn % Sp % AUC Sn % Sp %

SDR1,2 0.86 (0.04) 75.5 (9.2) 86.6 (7.2) 0.93 (0.02) 89.4 (2.9) 91.3 (2.1) n/a n/a n/a
KSD2 0.86 (0.05) 73.7 (10.1) 90.0 (9.3) 0.88 (0.02) 83.8 (3.5) 94.1 (1.1) 0.76 (0.07) 73.0 (13.3) 79.7 (17.9)
PANTHER2 0.88 (0.04) 74.6 (5.0) 94.2 (1.8) 0.91 (0.03) 85.5 (6.4) 93.4 (2.1) 0.66 (0.09) 61.0 (5.5) 79.9 (13.8)
GPS 0.83 76.0 87.2 0.94 97.8 89.8 0.72 56.0 88.2
KinasePhos 0.78 52.9 92.5 0.95 90.8 86.6 0.89 80.0 85.1
NetPhosK 0.90 86.3 78.8 0.57 16.8 95.4 0.68 60.0 71.4
PPSP 0.92 92.2 83.6 0.95 97.8 89.5 0.81 60.0 98.1
Scansite 0.95 86.3 93.3 0.94 94.6 87.8 0.70 64.0 93.2

1SDR method not applicable to Tyr kinases

2AUC, sensitivity and specificity values are the mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) of 10 cross-validation tests