Table 3.
GO Biological Process | Count | % | p-value |
response to stress | 5 | 19.23% | 0.002 |
alternative splicing | 5 | 19.23% | 0.005 |
protein binding | 16 | 61.54% | 0.007 |
response to hypoxia | 2 | 7.69% | 0.009 |
calcium ion binding | 4 | 15.38% | 0.010 |
mitotic spindle checkpoint | 2 | 7.69% | 0.018 |
spindle checkpoint | 2 | 7.69% | 0.018 |
anterior/posterior axis specification | 3 | 11.54% | 0.018 |
anterior/posterior pattern formation | 3 | 11.54% | 0.022 |
tissue development | 4 | 15.38% | 0.024 |
mitotic checkpoint | 2 | 7.69% | 0.025 |
calcium binding | 2 | 7.69% | 0.028 |
axis specification | 3 | 11.54% | 0.030 |
cell cycle checkpoint | 2 | 7.69% | 0.031 |
acetylation | 2 | 7.69% | 0.032 |
mesoderm development | 3 | 11.54% | 0.040 |
ventral cord development | 2 | 7.69% | 0.044 |
physiological process | 17 | 65.38% | 0.047 |
splice variant | 5 | 19.23% | 0.047 |
cytoplasm | 6 | 23.08% | 0.048 |
We compared our results to the results of a study published by McGraw et.al. (2004) that identified changes in gene expression in Drosophila females 1–3 hours after mating. Of the genes on our honey bee arrays, 336 were also found on the arrays used by McGraw et.al. (2004) [3]. Only 21 genes from this list were significantly regulated by mating in both bees and Drosophila. Several GO biological processes were overrepresented among the 21 transcripts differentially expressed in both data sets, such as: stress response, alternative splicing, protein binding, and tissue development.