Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2004 Dec;33(6):571–584. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000044741.09127.e6

Table IV.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Models Predicting Intention Ratings and Behavioral Skills

Intension Ratings Skills
Variable Entered Beta SE Beta p R2Δ Beta SE Beta p R2 Δ
Step 1 .25** .14*
 Log times without a condom 2.76 .73 <.001 −3.79 1.52 <.02
Step 2 .20** .24**
 Sexual sensation seeking 1.21 .80 ns −2.58 1.65 ns
 MCAS-Pleasure −.23 .09 <.02 .45 .19 <.02
Step 3 .05 .08
 Alcohol vs. Control + Placebo Contrast 1.28 .70 <.08 −3.14 1.43 <.04
 Placebo vs. Control Contrast .50 1.00 ns −2.58 2.11 ns

Note. N for Intentions analyses = 48, N for Skills = 42, MCAS = Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.