Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Neurol. 2008 Jan 19;211(1):67–84. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.01.003

Table 2.

Olfactory habituation/dishabituation of offspring of WT mothers (VIP +/+) mated to VIP +/− males and VIP deficient mothers (VIP +/−) mated with VIP +/− males. The number of seconds spent sniffing ±SEM of 3, 2 min presentations each of water, odor from Cage 1, and odor from Cage 2 was recorded.

WT mother VIP deficient mother
Offspring genotype VIP +/+
(n=15)
VIP +/−
(n=13)
VIP +/+
(n=26)
VIP+/−
(n=49)
VIP−/−
(n=18)
Sequence in which applicators were presented:
1st Water 1.9±0.3 2.06±0.4 1.5±02 1.8±0.2 1.5±0.2
2nd Water 1.6±0.2 1.3±0.2 1.1±0.1 1.2±0.1 1.2±0.2
3rd Water 0.9±0.1 1.3±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.9±0.1 0.8±0.1
1st Cage 1 7.0±0.7* 7.3±0.9* 10.3±0.8*# 9.5±0.5*# 9.4±0.7*#
2nd Cage 1 2.4±0.5 3.2±0.9 3.8±0.4 3.5±0.3 3.3±0.4
3rd Cage 1 1.5±0.3 2.0±0.4 2.4±0.4 2.5±0.3 2.2±0.3
1st Cage 2 3.7±0.7* 3.8±0.7* 4.5±0.4* 3.9±0.4* 3.5±0.4*
2nd Cage 2 1.6±0.4 1.9±0.3 1.8±0.3 1.98±0.2 2.0±0.3
3rd Cage 2 0.9±0.2 1.1±0.3 1.1±0.2 1.5±0.2 1.3±0.2
*

= significantly different from time spent sniffing previous applicator, p < 0.05.

#

= significantly different from time VIP +/+ offspring of WT mother spent sniffing 1st applicator with scent from Cage 1, p < 0.05.