TABLE 1.
Antibodya | Reactivity with tagged fusion protein in indicated assayb
|
||
---|---|---|---|
RFP
|
GST (WB) | ||
IFA | WB | ||
Anti-CT005 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT006 | − | + | + |
Anti-CT036 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT058 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT089 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT101 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT115 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT116 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT117 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT118 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT119 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT134 | − | − | +c |
Anti-CT135 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT147 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT164 | − | + | + |
Anti-CT179 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT192 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT195 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT196 | − | + | + |
Anti-CT214 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT222 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT223 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT224 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT225 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT226 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT227 | − | − | +c |
Anti-CT228 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT229 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT232 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT233 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT249 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT288 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT300 | − | + | + |
Anti-CT345 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT357 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT358 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT365 | − | − | +c |
Anti-CT383 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT440 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT442 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT449 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT483 | − | − | +c |
Anti-CT484 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT529 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT565 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT618 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT728 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT789 | − | − | +c |
Anti-CT813 | + | ND | + |
Anti-CT850 | + | ND | + |
Mouse antibodies raised with GST fusion proteins.
RFP and GST were tagged to the N termini of chlamydial proteins. IFA, immunofluorescence assay; WB, Western blot assay; +, positive reaction; −, negative reaction; ND, not detected.
These five antibodies only reacted with the corresponding GST, but not RFP, fusion proteins, suggesting that these antibodies cannot recognize C. trachomatis-specific proteins.