Skip to main content
. 2008 May 8;59(9):2285–2297. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern099

Table 3.

Chloroplast avoidance response as measured by leaf light transmission

Tukey level % Transmission (means±SD)
Wild-type ecotypes
Col (100) A 27.4±7.6
Ler (120) B 22.6±4.8
Ws (85) B 21.0±4.4
Ecotype Col
Wild type (100) A 27.4±7.6
phot1 A 24.5±4.9
arc6-4 (2) B 11.9±4.1
phot1/phot2 C –5.0±1.6
phot2 D –18.2±2.7
Ecotype Ler
arc1-1 (108) A 24.5±5.3
arc5-1/11–1 (12) A 24.3±5.9
arc11-1 (30) A 23.5±6.8
Wild type (120) AB 22.6±4.8
arc5-1 (13) AB 20.1±5.7
arc3-1 (18) B 18.2±4.8
arc6-1/1–1 (9) C 12.0±4.4
arc6-1 (2) C 11.1±3.5
Ecotype Ws
arc9-1 (34) A 23.2±3.9
arc7-1 (80) AB 22.3±5.8
Wild type (85) ABC 21.0±7.6
arc10-1 (38) BC 18.5±5.1
arc8-1 (45) C 17.8±4.9
arc6-1 (2) D 10.8±3.9

Arabidopsis thaliana [ecotypes Columbia (Col), Landsberg erecta (Ler), Wassilewskija (Ws)] wild-type and mutant plants were dark adapted overnight. Mature leaves were then harvested and placed in a device measuring the light transmission of the leaves at increasingly high blue light intensities for a total of 19 h. The values below represent the percentage changes in transmission at the end of the 1 h exposure to 100 μmol photon m−2 s−1 relative to the values at the end of the dark period (avoidance response). The numbers in brackets after the plant types represent the average chloroplast numbers per mesophyll cell. One-way ANOVA for Col: F=372.9, df = 4128, P < 0.0001; for Ler: F=28.7; df = 7,191, P < 0.0001; for Ws: F=24.1, df = 5,132, P < 0.0001. Groups not connected by the same letter are significantly different (Tukey–Kramer HSD).