Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 2;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-40

Table 3.

Comparison of overall Child-OIDP scores between face-to-face interview and self-administered questionnaire groups

Proxy measures rho p value
FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEW GROUP (n = 72)
Self-rated oral health status (poor/.../good) -0.04 0.747
Self-perceived need for braces (a little/.../a lot) 0.26 0.027
Happiness with dental appearance (unhappy/.../happy) -0.28 0.015
Frequency of thinking about dental appearance (not often/.../a lot) 0.37 0.001
SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONNAIRE GROUP (n = 72)
Self-rated oral health status (poor/.../good) -0.11 0.346
Self-perceived need for braces (a little/.../a lot) 0.12 0.325
Happiness with dental appearance (unhappy/.../happy) -0.24 0.039
Frequency of thinking about dental appearance (not often/.../a lot) 0.13 0.297
COMPARISON OF CORRELATIONS BETWEEN GROUPS
Self-rated oral health status (poor/.../good) --- 0.662
Self-perceived need for braces (a little/.../a lot) --- 0.394
Happiness with dental appearance (unhappy/.../happy) --- 0.787
Frequency of thinking about dental appearance (not often/.../a lot) --- 0.118

Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was used

(*) Fisher's Z-transformation was used