Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2008 Feb 7;51(1):148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.01.001

Table 1.

Characteristics of Participants.

Non-obese
(n = 153)
Obese
(n = 73)
Probability of difference p<

M ± SD M ± SD F

Age (y), 14.2 ± 2.5 14.9 ± 2.4 F = 4.1 0.05

BMI z-score, 0.48 ± .80 2.2 ± .40 F = 30.9 0.001

χ2

Race (% of group)
 African American 24.8 41.1 4.1 nsa
 Asian 5.9 1.4
 Caucasian 63.4 53.4
 Hispanic 3.9 1.4
 Other 2.0 2.7

Sex (%)
 Female 52.0 56.2 0.21 nsa

SESb (median) 2.0 2.0 8.5 nsa
a

ns = non-significant (p > 0.05);

b

SES = Socioeconomic status (Hollingshead, 1975); lower scores are indicative of higher SES.

Scores generated from the Hollingshead Index are based upon two scales: Occupation (ranging from “1=higher executive, proprietors of large businesses and major professionals” to “7=farm laborers/menial service workers”) and Education (ranging from 1=graduate professional training to 7=less than 7 yrs education). The occupation items are multiplied by 7 and the education scale items are multiplied by 4. The scores are then averaged for both parents and a final scaling is based upon the 1 through 5 variables. Therefore, a child with a score of 2 might have parents who both completed undergraduate college degrees and worked as “administrators, lesser professionals, or proprietors of medium-sized businesses”; One child had a BMI below the 5th percentile. Findings did not differ when this participant was removed from the sample. Therefore, this child's data is included in the analyses presented.