Table 1.
MisconceptionsStudents mistakenly think that: | |||
-Biological science and imaging science are unrelated | -Biological images can only reveal structure but not function | -Biological images are pretty pictures but not quantifiable | -The impact of imaging techniques on biology and medicine is limited |
Learning GoalsStudents will: | |||
-Conclude that the scale of biology studied must match the scale captured by an imaging device | -Appraise the utility of imaging tools to examine structure and function of biological processes | -Discover that imaging is a quantitative tool used to measure data across a wide range of biological scale | -Generalize that biological images hold prominent places in advancing biology and medicine and contribute to the NIH Roadmap initiative |
-Develop interpretation skills by examining different imaging formats and multiple biological scales using real data | -Evaluate imaging methods that provide ways of knowing structure and function | -Develop computer and computation skills | -Understand that imaging is an integrated multidisciplinary field |
Learning OutcomeHaving achieved the learning goal, students will be able to: | |||
-Summarize the relationship between biological and imaging scale | -To predict the rabbit Alba's color from fluorescence emission of eGFP | -Proficiently use NIH ImageJ software to calculate NanoBucky's height and image intensity | -Value that (1) nanoimaging advances the development of nanodevices and nanomedicine |
-Accurately interpret:(1) nanoimages of NanoBucky (2) molecular images of fluorescent probe intensity from (a) bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (b) eGFP labeled human embryonic stem (ES) cells (3) system-level images of (a) eGFP rabbit Alba (b) MRI image of brain (c) CT image of Phineas Gage's skull | -Evaluate the intensity of eGFP labeled ES cells to understand ES function | -Apply ImageJ principles to: (1) Interpret the intensity of eGFP labeled cells | (2) molecular imaging advances tissue engineering and regenerative medicine |
-Assess functional brain activity using 18-FDG PET measures of glucose metabolism | (2) Quantify and localize brain function using PET images | (3) system-level imaging (e.g., PET) advances nuclear medicine | |
-To explain and give examples of imaging tools | -Identify disease using X-ray images of lung with and without pneumonia and PET images of brain with and without a tumor | ||
-Compare 2D, 3D VR, and stereolithograph models of brain and Phineas Gage's skull and contrast them for visual information quality and biological utility |
Activities Students engage in the following activities to achieve the goals:
Mini-lectures, ImageJ analysis, in-class NIH Roadmap activities, Gillespie assessment, SALG assessment, pre and postinstruction assessment