Skip to main content
. 2008 Summer;7(2):193–201. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-01-0007

Table 5.

Average pre/post scores for key misconceptions questions among local students comparing EvoBeaker's ″Flowers and Trees″ lab and Clade-Race+Lecture groupsa,b

Misconception Group Average pretestscores (SD) Average posttestscores (SD) Delta (% ±)
M1: Incorrect Mapping of Time EvoBeaker's ″Flowers and Trees″ lab (n = 27) 0.226 (0.236) 0.056 (0.115) -0.170 (-75%)
Clade-Race+Lecture (n = 22) 0.123 (0.169) 0.055 (0.15) -0.068 (-56%)
M2: Tip Proximity Indicates Relationship EvoBeaker's ″Flowers and Trees″ lab (n = 27) 0.130 (0.263) 0.093 (0.242) -0.037 (-29%)
Clade-Race+Lecture (n = 22) 0.091 (0.197) 0 (0) -0.091 (-100%)
M3: Node Counting EvoBeaker's ″Flowers and Trees″ lab (n = 27) 0.420 (0.286) 0.259 (0.267) -0.160 (-38%)
Clade-Race+Lecture (n = 22) 0.424 (0.234) 0.348 (0.281) -0.076 (-18%)
M4: Straight Line Equals No Change EvoBeaker's ″Flowers and Trees″ lab (n = 27) 0.365 (0.199) 0.291 (0.204) -0.074 (-20%)
Clade-Race+Lecture (n = 22) 0.357 (0.175) 0.273 (0.192) -0.084 (-24%)

aScores have been scaled between 0 and 1 to facilitate comparisons. Note that a lower score indicates a smaller measure of that misconception.

bThere were no statistically significant differences between EvoBeaker's ″Flowers and Trees″ lab and Clade-Race+Lecture groups at the p < .05 level when corrected for multiple comparisons.