Table 2.

Pearson's correlation coefficients between true values and MED-predicted values of expression levels (E), relative motif binding strengths (M) and relative TF activities (A), when the expression data are obtained from 300, 100 and 30 conditions, respectively

Noise level (%)	E			M ratio (within-column)a			A ratio (within-row)b
	300 conditions	100 conditions	30 conditions	300 conditions	100 conditions	30 conditions	300 conditions	100 conditions	30 conditions
0	1.000 ± 0.000	0.997 ± 0.004	1.000 ± 0.000	0.998	0.993	0.976	0.996	0.998	0.996
5	0.997 ± 0.001	0.997 ± 0.001	0.998 ± 0.001	0.986	0.989	0.946	0.992	0.987	0.993
10	0.991 ± 0.005	0.990 ± 0.006	0.989 ± 0.009	0.988	0.933	0.867	0.964	0.956	0.976
20	0.962 ± 0.026	0.964 ± 0.025	0.967 ± 0.027	0.942	0.845	0.699	0.930	0.906	0.916
30	0.929 ± 0.036	0.930 ± 0.037	0.934 ± 0.049	0.904	0.840	0.586	0.862	0.873	0.818
40	0.872 ± 0.063	0.880 ± 0.061	0.887 ± 0.076	0.848	0.760	0.579	0.771	0.798	0.744
50	0.834 ± 0.067	0.833 ± 0.078	0.841 ± 0.098	0.812	0.611	0.404	0.714	0.680	0.623
100	0.606 ± 0.099	0.595 ± 0.125	0.652 ± 0.164	0.587	0.361	0.224	0.435	0.359	0.314

^aRelative binding strengths of the same motif in two genes.

^bRelative activities of the same TF under two different conditions.