Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2003 Jun;43(12):1387–1396. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00146-9

Table 1.

Dependence of the OFR on the disparity of the conditioning bands (parameters of the least-squares best-fit Gaussian functions): sensitivity to the disparity of the test bands.

Subj Motion Test Disparity dt Y-offset A Scale factor g Widthσ X-offset μ Peak P Amplit P-A r2 Range of N Mean Difference in Vergence Angle Slope:μ vs. dt
FM Test leftward Cond rightward Uncrossed 0.023 0.337 0.86 0.07 0.179 0.156 0.98 166–174 0.015* 0.18 (0.18)
Zero −0.085 0.198 0.55 0.11 0.058 0.142 0.92 172–176
crossed −0.023 0.192 0.88 0.65 0.064 0.087 0.94 164–175
Test rightward
Cond leftward
uncrossed 0.188 −0.533 1.02 0.55 −0.020 −0.208 0.96 166–175 0.017* 0.06 (0.07)
zero 0.311 −0.344 0.98 0.80 0.171 −0.140 0.92 167–177
crossed 0.162 −0.235 0.77 0.76 0.041 −0.121 0.91 163–177
DY Test leftward Cond rightward uncrossed −0.059 0.250 0.75 0.49 0.073 0.132 0.99 123–137 0.015* 0.05 (0.04)
zero −0.125 0.184 0.63 0.41 −0.008 0.117 0.97 126–138
crossed −0.099 0.237 0.72 0.64 0.033 0.132 0.98 126–135
Test rightward
Cond leftward
uncrossed 0.057 −0.225 0.71 0.63 −0.069 −0.126 0.99 127–136 0.005 0.06 (0.07)
zero 0.136 −0.152 0.67 0.56 0.045 −0.091 0.95 129–138
crossed 0.098 −0.233 0.70 0.82 −0.035 −0.133 0.99 127–134
BS Test leftward Cond rightward uncrossed −0.113 0.401 0.98 −0.19 0.051 0.164 0.97 69–76 0.019* 0.02 (0.01)
zero −0.181 0.342 0.92 −0.41 −0.033 0.148 0.99 69–79
crossed −0.110 0.439 0.90 −0.13 0.086 0.196 0.99 70–76
Test rightward
Cond leftward
uncrossed 0.106 −0.434 1.08 −0.04 −0.054 −0.160 0.95 69–81 0.024* 0.02 (0.02)
zero 0.162 −0.308 0.77 −0.28 0.002 −0.160 0.96 69–80
crossed 0.071 −0.368 0.83 0.04 −0.105 −0.176 0.98 69–79
NB Test leftward Cond rightward uncrossed 0.001 0.204 0.82 0.34 0.100 0.099 0.90 74–82 0.022* 0.01(0.01)
zero −0.085 0.187 0.73 0.00 0.017 0.102 0.99 74–82
crossed −0.026 0.275 0.79 0.36 0.112 0.138 0.98 75–82
Test rightward
Cond leftward
uncrossed 0.072 −0.179 0.64 0.23 −0.040 −0.112 0.96 75–81 0.021* 0.04 (0.03)
zero 0.144 −0.118 0.66 −0.04 0.073 −0.071 0.92 75–81
crossed 0.077 −0.170 0.60 0.35 −0.037 −0.114 0.95 74–81

The Gaussian function in Expression 1 was fitted to plots like those in Fig. 1, each plot having 13 data points, which were the means of multiple samples (Range of N, range of samples used for each mean); the parameters of these fits are given by A, σ, μ, P, and P-A, which are in degrees, and g, which is dimensionless. Mean Difference in Vergence Angle, a mean pre-response vergence angle was first computed by averaging the vergence angles over the time period 0–83 ms (from onset of stimulus motion) for all 13 conditioning disparities for each value of dt, then the mean pre-response vergence angle when dt was uncrossed was subtracted from the mean pre-response vergence angle when dt was crossed. Slope: μ vs. dt, gives the slopes of the linear regression of x-offset (μ) on the disparity of the test bands (dt); values in parentheses were obtained after adjusting the disparities for any vergence error.

*

p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).