Table 4.
Summary of Results of Hierarchical Regression Model Predicting Response to Three Prompts Across Two Role-Play Videos
| Prompt 1 | Prompt 2 | Prompt 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE B | R2 Change | B | SE B | R2 change | B | SE B | R2 Change | |
| Step 1 | 0.16* | 0.16* | 0.16** | ||||||
| No. partners, past year | −0.87 | 0.33** | −1.10 | 0.37** | −0.94 | 0.36** | |||
| Age | −0.25 | 0.19 | −0.23 | 0.22 | 0.43* | 0.21* | |||
| Leigh total score | −0.56 | 0.41 | −0.44 | 0.46 | −0.23 | 0.45 | |||
| Step 2 | 0.03 | 0.11** | 0.08* | ||||||
| No. partners, past year | −0.94 | 0.33** | −1.20 | 0.35** | −1.05 | 0.35** | |||
| Age | −0.29 | 0.19 | −0.30 | 0.21 | −0.49 | 0.21* | |||
| Leigh total score | −0.52 | 0.41 | −0.35 | 0.44 | −0.16 | 0.44 | |||
| Perception intoxication | −0.58 | 0.43 | −1.21 | 0.46** | −1.02 | 0.45* | |||
| Step 3 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.00 | ||||||
| No. partners, past year | −1.11 | 0.34** | −1.34 | 0.36** | −1.07 | 0.37** | |||
| Age | −0.37 | 0.20 | −0.41 | 0.21 | −0.51 | 0.22* | |||
| Leigh total score | −0.48 | 0.40 | −0.30 | 0.43 | −0.15 | 0.44 | |||
| Perception intoxication | −0.59 | 0.42 | −1.22 | 0.45** | −1.02 | 0.46* | |||
| Perception X Leigh | 0.66 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.52 | |||
p ≤ .05,,
p ≤ .01
Note: Leigh and perception of intoxication data were centered before analysis.
N s = 53, 53, and 54 for analyses of the prompts 1, 2, and 3 data, respectively.