Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2008 Feb 19;1205:55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.108

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of participants. Standard deviation in parentheses.

(a) Participants with standardized test data available
FFW-LI FFW-TD NoTx Control P
N 7 9 13 -
# Male / # Female 5 / 2 2 / 7 6 / 7 -
Age 7.5 (.7) 7.6 (.7) 7.7 (.7) ns
Maternal Educationa 4.7 (.5) 5.0 (1.2) 5.3 (.9) <.01c
Familial SESb 35 (13) 42 (9) 44 (12) ns
(b) Participants with electrophysiological data available
FFW-LI FFW-TD NoTx Control P

N 7 9 11 -
# Male / # Female 5 / 2 4 / 5 5 / 6 -
Age (in years) 7.2 (.9) 7.6 (.8) 7.8 (.8) ns
Maternal Educationa 5.1 (.9) 5.0 (.7) 5.7 (.8) ns
Familial SESb 39 (16) 42 (10) 42 (12) ns
a

Level of maternal education measured using categories from the Hollingshead Index of Social Status (Hollingshead, 1975). Values range from 1 (less than 7th grade) to 7 (graduate professional training). A score of 4 indicates high school graduation, and a score of 5 represents partial college.

b

Familial socio-economic status (SES) measured using the Hollingshead Index of Social Status. Scores on the index represent one of five social strata corresponding to upper (55–66), upper-middle (40–54), middle (30–39), lower-middle (20–29), or lower (8–19) class.

c

Post-hoc Tukey’s tests indicated that maternal education in the FFW-LI group was significantly lower than the NoTx control group (P < .01). No other between-group differences were statistically significant (all P > .1)