Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2007 Sep;87(1):40–50. doi: 10.1002/bip.20769

Table II.

Conformer Distributions Around t1 in Molecular Dynamics Simulations (Each of 4 ns) of Spin-Labeled Phosphorothioate-Modified d(CTACTGCTTTAG).d(CTAAAGCAGTAG) Duplexes

t1 Distribution (%)
t1 Distribution (%)
Simulation No.a Label 1 +60 180 −60 Label 2 +60 180 −60
1 7-SP 17.3 77.1 5.6 19-SP 54.4 43.8 1.7
2 7-RP 32.5 36.6 30.9 19-RP 20.3 36.5 43.3
3 7-SP 46.5 52.6 0.9 19-RP 0.0 37.8 62.2
4 7-RP 39.1 17.2 43.7 19-SP 50.2 49.6 0.2
5b 7-SP 55.2 40.0 4.8 19-SP 45.4 52.5 2.1
6b 7-RP 26.9 27.7 45.4 19-RP 0.7 21.8 77.5
7b 7-SP 62.1 37.2 0.7 19-RP 0.0 66.4 33.6
8b 7-RP 26.3 18.6 55.1 19-SP 57.8 41.8 0.4
9 5-SP 68.1 28.8 3.1 17-SP 58.4 40.3 1.3
10 5-RP 0.0 17.3 82.7 17-RP 15.8 18.9 65.3
11 5-SP 53.2 46.7 0.1 17-RP 2.5 18.0 79.6
12 5-RP 0.2 33.4 66.4 17-SP 15.0 83.6 1.5
13 2-SP 64.3 33.8 2.0 14-SP 25.4 72.6 2.1
14 2-RP 0.1 13.9 86.0 14-RP 0.0 55.3 44.7
15 2-SP 31.7 27.8 40.5 14-RP 4.7 30.7 64.6
16 2-RP 0.2 38.6 61.1 14-SP 38.9 60.7 0.4
a

Simulation nos. 1–4 and nos. 9–16 had a starting geometry based on 1CS2 (model 1) with both labels having t1 = t2 = t3 = 180°(for definitions of t1, t2, and t3, see Figure 2).

b

Simulation nos. 5–8 had a starting geometry based on 1CS2 (model 1) and labels with t1 = 60°(SP) or − 60°(RP), t2 = 180°, and t3 = 0°.