Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 8;85(2):162–177. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9260-4

TABLE 5.

Factors associated with high or low performance, by PPH goal area

Goal area High performance factors Low performance factors
Capacity building: Community group Having strong leadership (i.e. facilitation skills, shared leadership, etc.)—80% Staffing issues related to recruitment and turnover—50%
Possessing dedicated and talented staff—76% Communication challenges—50%
Working in a small and/or well-defined community—84% Other challenges working in the community/trust building—50%
Establishing relationships with residents and/or skilled outreach—84% Leadership problems—42%
Lack of resident engagement—42%
Other organizational problems—33%
Capacity building: Health Department Having strong leadership committed to working with community—80% Communication challenges—35%
Working with community on data collection and distribution—75% Lack of leadership/organizational support for community-based approaches to public health—29%
Bureaucratic nature of the health department impedes work with community—29%
  Lack of resident engagement—29%
  Other challenges working with community—29%
Partnership development Mutual understanding and trust between the health department and community group—80% Communication challenges—both internal and external—50%
Establishing relationships with residents and/or skilled outreach—76% Lack of resident engagement—50%
Working in a small and/or well defined community—72% Other challenges of working in the community—42%
Having a stable, knowledgeable group of core members—60% Inability to develop and/or maintain a clear purpose of vision—33%
Open communication and sharing of information—60%
Community health improvement Being opportunistic and flexible—83% Communication challenges—both internal and external—46%
Working in a small and/or well defined community—58% Lack of resident engagement—46%
Establishing relationships with residents and/or skilled outreach—75% Other challenges of working in the community—46%
Communicating openly and sharing of information—67% Inability to develop and/or maintain a clear purpose of vision—38%
Inadequate funding or resources—23%
Policy/systems change Ability to network effectively—82% Communication challenges—both internal and external—60%
Having access to community leaders—72% Lack of time and skills required to plan and implement policy change activities—46%
Working in a small and/or well defined community—72% Other challenges of working in the community—40%
Establishing relationships with residents and/or skilled outreach—77% Lack of resident engagement—33%
Open communication and sharing of information—68% Inability to develop and/or maintain a clear purpose or vision—33%
Inadequate funding or resources—26%

Factors identified by local evaluator (see text). Percentages show the number of high (or low) performing partnerships with the indicated positive (or negative) characteristics.