TABLE 4.
Relationships between environmental characteristics and the number of individuals observed walking, bicycling, and jogging in the segments
| Walking | Bicycling | Jogging | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Street | |||
| Traffic volume (vehicles/30 min) | 0.26* | 0.01 | −0.04 |
| Number of traffic control efforts | −0.11 | 0.17 | −0.07 |
| Number of street lights | 0.05 | −0.19 | −0.03 |
| Sidewalk | |||
| Slab incongruence (%) | −0.09 | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| Defective (%) | 0.39** | 0.01 | −0.01 |
| Obstructed (%) | 0.09 | −0.09 | 0.08 |
| Crack growth/overgrowth instances | 0.16 | −0.19 | −0.02 |
| Aethetics | |||
| Grass height (cm) | −0.10 | −0.16 | 0.06 |
| Landscapable (%) | −0.27* | −0.28* | 0.12 |
| Properties with graffiti (%) | 0.30* | 0.04 | −0.37 |
| Pieces of litter | 0.43*** | −0.22 | 0.03 |
| Properties with chipped paint (%) | 0.19 | −0.14 | 0.05 |
| Number of trees | −0.15 | −0.14 | 0.12 |
| Properties with flowers (%) | −0.26* | −0.20 | 0.10 |
ns = correlation coefficient (r) was not significant
*p < .05; **p < 0.005;***p < 0.001