Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 21;33(2):111–131. doi: 10.1080/02713680701851902

TABLE 5.

Summary of studies evaluating the treatment of macular edema in BRVO by sheathotomy (VA = visual acuity, ME = macular edema, ILM = internal limiting membrane)

Author Study type Patients Follow-up (mean) Outcomes Comments
Osterloh and Charles75 Case report. 1 eye. 8 months. VA improved from 20/200 to 20/25. First report of sheathotomy.
Garcia-Arumi et al.76 Prospective interventional nonrandomized study. 40 eyes—all underwent vitrectomy, sheathotomy and injection of 25 mg of tissue plasminogen activator into occluded vein. 13 months. Thrombus release in 11 eyes (27.5%)—correlated with early surgery. VA increased from 20/100 to 20/40 (p = 0.016).
Yamamoto et al.77 Retrospective interventional comparative case series. 20 eyes—sheathotomy 16 control eyes (posterior vitreous detachment via vitrectomy). 12 months. VA: significantly better in both groups (p = 0.008 and p = 0.001, respectively). VA and foveal thickness were not significantly different between the groups.
Charbonnel et al.78 Prospective nonrandomized, interventional case series. 13 eyes—sheathotomy. 7 months. Improvement in VA ≥ 2 ETDRS lines in 9 eyes (69%). Absence of previous posterior vitreous detachment correlated with improvement in VA.
Sohn et al.79 Retrospective interventional case series. 22 eyes—sheathotomy + ILM peeling in all eyes. 3 months. Improvement in VA (log MAR) from 0.79 ± 0.29 to 0.57 ± 0.33 (p < 0.01). All eyes pretreated with grid laser or triamcinolone.
Kumagai et al.80 Prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional study. Group 1: 18 eyes—sheathotomy. Group 2: 18 controls (vitrectomy without sheathotomy). 31 months. VA (log MAR) in group 1: 0.52 → 0.08. In group 2: 0.53 → 0.014. Differences between group 1 and 2 was not significant.
Avci et al.81 Retrospective interventional comparative case series. 11 eyes—sheathotomy. 10 control eyes—grid laser photocoagulation. 9 months. VA (log MAR): sheathotomy: 0.84 → 0.36. Grid laser: 1.06 → 0.82. Difference was significant.
Horio et al.82 Interventional case series. 7 eyes. 6 months. Significant improvement in retinal blood flow (p < 0.01) and reduced macular thickness (p = 0.03).
Lakhanpal et al.83 Retrospective interventional case series. 12 eyes. 49.9 weeks. VA (logMAR) improved from 1.00 ± 0.32 to 0.56 ± 0.28 (p = 0.0003). 25-gauge transvitreal limited arteriovenous crossing manipulation without vitrectomy.
Mester et al.84 Prospective interventional nonrandomized case-control study. 43 eyes—sheathotomy. 16 eyes additionally + ILM peeling. 25 control eyes. 6 weeks. 26 patients (60%) gained ≥ 2 lines of VA. Better result in patients with ILM peeling. ME and intraretinal hemorrhage resorbed in all patients. All patients had isovolaemic hemodilution for 10 days.
Opremcak et al.85 Prospective interventional case series. 15 eyes. 6.5 years. Snellen VA improved in 10 patients (67%) by an average of 4 lines vision (range 1–9 lines). In 3 patients resolution of ME but no improvement of VA. Retinal vascular bleeding in 2 patients.
Asensio Sanchez et al.86 Prospective interventional nonrandomized study. 13 eyes—sheathotomy, 5 eyes underwent additionally ILM peeling. 12 months. VA improved in 12 patients (92%). Better results in patients with ILM peeling.
Lerche et al.87 Prospective nonrandomized intervention case series. 12 eyes – sheathotomy. 3 months. VA (logMAR) improved from 0.74 to 0.56.
Mason et al.88 Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional study with concurrent control group. 20 eyes—sheathotomy. 20 control eyes (10 of them without intervention and another 10 underwent grid laser). 14 months (sheathotomy). 19 months (controls). VA improvement: Sheathotomy: from 20/250 to 20/63. Controls: from 20/180 to 20/125 (p = 0.02). 45% of the surgical group had final VA ≥ 20/40 compared with 15% of the controls. Data only for whole control group together.
Cahil et al.89 Retrospective non-controlled case series. 27 eyes—sheathotomy. 12 months. Resolution of ME in 8 (29.6%) patients, reduction in 14 (51.8%) and persistence in 5 (18.5.%).
Becquet et al.90 Prospective nonrandomized interventional case series. 6 eyes (sheathotomy + ILM peeling. 6 controls (ILM peeling only). 6 months. Significant improvement of VA in both groups. No difference in VA or foveolar thickness between the groups (p = 0.5; p = 0.6 respectively).
Martinez-Soroa et al.91 Retrospective interventional case series. 17 eyes—sheathotomy. 6 months. Improvement in VA from 0.26 to 0.4. 53% patients improved ≥ 4 lines (Snellen).
Le Rouic92 Retrospective interventional case series. 3 eyes—sheathotomy. 10 months. No improvement in VA observed. All patients with initial VA < 20/40.
Dotrelova et al.93 Retrospective interventional case series. 3 eyes—sheathotomy. 12 months. VA improved in 2 patients to 20/40, in 1 patient stabilized (20/180).
Shah et al.94 Retrospective interventional case series. 5 eyes—sheathotomy. 6.5 years. VA preoperative in all patients ≤ 20/200. Improved in 4 eyes from 20/30 to 20/70. 1 eye with counting fingers remained unchanged.
Crafoord et al.95 Retrospective interventional case series. 12 eyes—sheathotomy. 20 months. VA improved in 9 eyes (75%), in 1 eye (8.3%) remained unchanged and deteriored in 2 eyes (16.7%). 2 patients received additionally 25 mg triamcinolone acetonide at the end of the surgery.
Han et al.96 Retrospective interventional case series. 20 eyes—pars plana vitrectomy and dissection of the arteriovenous crossing without separation of the vessels. 10.5 months. In 16 eyes (80%) improved VA ≥ 2 lines. Mean improvement of VA (logMAR) was = 0.44 ± 0.14 (p = 0.016).