Table 4.
Mean percent signal change (and S.D.) within the Fusiform (fusi.), posterior PFC (pPFC) and inferior PFC (iPFC) across Task, Stimulus and Novel vs. Primed
| Region | Same |
Reverse |
Orthogonal |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Degraded | Complete | Degraded | Complete | Degraded | |
| Fusi. | ||||||
| Novel | .43 (.35) | .50 (.40) | .40 (.31) | .45 (.36) | .25 (.31) | .40 (.31) |
| Primed | .25 (.30) | .39 (.40) | .20 (.29) | .26 (.31) | .14 (.29) | .25 (.31) |
| pPFC | ||||||
| Novel | .11 (.66) | .22 (.66) | .14 (.58) | .20 (.62) | .14 (.44) | .32 (.55) |
| Primed | −.13 (.58) | −.06 (.58) | −.02 (.57) | .00 (.57) | .05 (.49) | .10 (.49) |
| iPFC | ||||||
| Novel | .14 (.34) | .17 (.27) | .14 (.36) | .06 (.46) | .13 (.38) | .16 (.34) |
| Primed | −.05 (.35) | −.01 (.35) | −.02 (.43) | −.06 (.47) | .07 (.35) | .11 (.37) |
Percent signal change refers to the peak of the fitted BOLD impulse response, and is relative to the grand mean over all voxels and scans. Note that the baseline level of 0 was not estimated reliably in this design, so only relative patterns across conditions are meaningful.