TABLE 1.
Pearson's coefficient (Rp) | Overlap coefficient (Ro) | xy optical sections (n) | Cells (n) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A. Endogenous SgII vs. CgB | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 254 | 17 |
B. GFP chimera vs. endogenous CgBa | ||||
SIG-GFP | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 72 | 4 |
SIG-SgII-(25-41)-GFP | 0.10 ± 0.05b | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 71 | 5 |
SIG-SgII-(334-348)-GFP | 0.39 ± 0.04c | 0.44 ± 0.01c | 73 | 4 |
SIG-SgII-GFP | 0.39 ± 0.05c | 0.41 ± 0.05c | 121 | 6 |
C. EAP chimera vs. CgBd | ||||
SIG-EAP | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 85 | 4 |
SIG-SgII-(25-41)-EAP | 0.52 ± 0.07c | 0.60 ± 0.06e | 129 | 6 |
SIG-SgII-(334-348)-EAP | 0.67 ± 0.08e | 0.72 ± 0.06e | 97 | 4 |
SIG-SgII-EAP | 0.49 ± 0.05c | 0.52 ± 0.05c | 95 | 4 |
D. GFP chimera vs. CFP chimeraf | ||||
SIG-SgII-GFP vs. | ||||
GalT-CFP | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 43 | 4 |
GalT-CFP-SgIIa | 0.77 ± 0.03e | 0.77 ± 0.03e | 43 | 4 |
SIG-GFP vs. | ||||
GalT-CFP | 0.73 ± 0.07e | 0.74 ± 0.07e | 27 | 3 |
GalT-CFP-SgII | 0.64 ± 0.03e | 0.65 ± 0.03e | 35 | 3 |
Values are given as the means ± S.E. p values for difference within groups were determined as compared with the lowest value of colocalization coefficient obtained for SIG-GFP versus CgB.
p > 0.05; ANOVA with Dunnett's post test.
p < 0.01; ANOVA with Dunnett's post test.
p values for difference within groups were determined as compared with the lowest value of colocalization coefficient obtained for SIG-EAP versus CgB.
p < 0.001; ANOVA with Dunnett's post test.
p values for difference within groups were determined as compared with the lowest value of colocalization coefficient obtained for SIG-SgII-GFP versus GalT-CFP.