Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 2;3(7):e2535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002535

Table 6. IFN-γ-based comparison of ELISA, LINCO 29-plex, Bio-Rad 17-plex and RnD Systems Fluorokine-MAP-13-plex assays.

RnD Systems ELISA (pg/ml) LINCO 29-plex (pg/ml) Bio-Rad 17-plex (pg/ml) RnD Systems Fluorokine-MAP (pg/ml)
Whole blood supernatant
PHA-stimulated 1731.38 451.56 64.7 86.83
Negative Control 0 1.39 0 NA
Mtb derived antigen 1 (supernatant A) 1181.6 969.12 0 NA
Mtb derived antigen 1 (supernatant B) 908.83 950.62 2.14 NA
Mtb derived antigen 2 (supernatant B) 839.42 536.92 193.53 NA
Mtb derived antigen 3 (supernatant D) 489.1 247 49.08 30.26
Mtb derived antigen 2 (supernatant C) 235.67 125.97 104.94 17.65
Mtb derived antigen 4 (supernatant E) 118.9 133.82 172.19 NA
Mtb derived antigen 3 (supernatant C) 57.5 55.63 0 1.56
Mtb derived antigen 5 (supernatant E) 23.78 0.44 99.2 0.28

NA: Not applicable because the sample was not measured with the RnD Systems Fluorokine-MAP base kit A

Supernatant was generated using whole blood from a healthy donor (A-E) in six day assays stimulated with 5 differents Mtb derived antigens and with phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). The LINCO 29-plex measurement most closely resembled that of the RnD Systems ELISA in absolute value, and followed a similar trend, but absolute values for all three luminex assay fell below that of the ELISA.