Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Jan 17;129(2):361–370. doi: 10.1021/ja0656604

Table 2.

Interatomic distances for PTX conformations as compared to REDOR-determined separations for PTX on tubulin.graphic file with name nihms-49350-t0013.jpg

Distance, Å
Separation Cmpd Polar modela Nonpolar modelb PTX-NY modelc,d 1JFFe T-Taxol modeld,f REDOR distance
R1-R2g 4 7.4 8.0 7.3 6.5 7.9 7.8h
R1-R3g 5 5.5 7.2 6.4 7.2 6.6 6.3h
R2-R3 4 4.5 12.5 13.3 11.6 12.2 >8h
R2-CH 2 9.6 8.5 9.4 9.3 9.9 10.3i
R2-C 2 10.4 6.2 10.0 8.1 9.1 9.8i
a

Mastropaolo, D.; Camerman, A.; Luo, Y.; Brayer, G. D.; Camerman, N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 6920−6924.

b

Williams, H. J.; Scott, A. I.; Dieden, R. A.; Swindell, C. S.; Chirlian, L. E.; Francl, M. M.; Heerding, J.; Krauss, N. E. Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 6545−6560; Ref. 13.

c

Ref. 18.

d

The values of R2-CH and R2-C were inadvertently switched in Figure 1 of Ref. 16.

e

Ref. 5.

f

Ref. 7.

g

Distances from the 4-OAc methyl group were taken as an average of the three hydrogen positions.

h

This work, ± 0.5 Å

i

Ref. 15.