Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2706–2710. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.149

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Three coupling regimes used for in vitro testing. When air pockets were manually removed from the coupling interface (left) stone breakage was more efficient than with single coupling (middle) or decoupling/re-coupling (right). Top row shows original photographs of the coupling interface. Middle row shows digitized images with air pockets highlighted for better visibility. Surface area occupied by air pockets in these images was about 0.5%, 6% and 15%, respectively. Bottom row shows stone fragments retained by 2-mm mesh basket following 500 SW’s (power level 3, 60 SW/min) for four stones treated with each coupling regime.