Table 2:

White matter regions within the boundaries of the AAL^* atlas where control subjects were significantly greater than dyslexic subjects in the skeletonized fractional anisotropy

Brain Region	t Statistic	No. of Voxels	MNI Coordinates†			Brodmann Area	Stanberry Comparison
			x	y	z
Precentral L	2.55	42	−35	−7	38	6	No
Precentral R	2.94	88	52	0	21	6	No
Frontal Sup R	2.97	54	19	55	17	10	Yes
Frontal Mid R	2.81	45	36	36	17	46	Yes
Frontal Inf Oper R	2.80	86	55	19	0	44	Yes
Frontal Inf Tri R	2.80	38	38	43	1	45	Yes
Frontal Inf Orb L	3.02	60	−47	38	−12	47	No
Frontal Inf Orb R	2.74	91	51	36	−8	47	No
Supp Motor Area R	2.95	44	14	3	61	6	No
Cuneus R	2.89	59	9	−94	12	18	No
Lingual L	2.84	49	−10	−89	−17	18	No
Occipital Sup L	2.77	31	−20	−90	18	18	No
Occipital Sup R	2.78	36	26	−76	26	7	No
Occipital Mid R	2.92	51	42	−77	18	7	Yes
Fusiform L	2.90	21	−20	−84	−19	18	Yes
Fusiform R	2.76	81	41	−11	−32	20	Yes
Postcentral L	3.12	26	−52	−19	30	48	No
Postcentral R	2.53	27	53	−1	22	3	No
Parietal Sup L	3.10	42	−14	−72	47	5	No
Parietal Inf L	2.68	28	−30	−43	45	40	No
Parietal Inf R	3.31	41	47	−47	40	40	Yes
Precuneus L	2.76	16	−10	−72	48	7	No
Putamen L	2.84	32	−17	11	2	0	No
Temporal Sup L	2.69	48	−48	−33	8	22	No
Temporal Pole Sup L	2.88	32	−23	15	−31	38	No
Temporal Mid L	3.08	69	−47	−34	8	39	No
Temporal Inf L	2.79	104	−60	−54	−19	37	Yes
Temporal Inf R	2.57	27	41	−9	−33	20	Yes

Note:—The last column shows the regions where both the current study and Stanberry et al⁸ functional connectivity study have consistency; Sup, superior; Inf, inferior; Orb, orbital; Supp, supplementary; Oper, operculum; L, left; R, right.

^*AAL refers to the Automated Anatomical Labeling map which is a 3-dimensional map containing 116 brain regions co-registered to standard MNI space.

^†MNI coordinates refers to a standard brain imaging coordinate system developed by the Montreal Neurological Institute.