Skip to main content
. 2008 May 28;10(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-27

Table 2.

Comparison of 2D reference against 3D 5× k-t SENSE images before (pre-Gd) and after (post-Gd) contrast administration (n = 26)

LV EDV (ml) LV ESV (ml) LV mass (g) LVEF (%)
2D mean ± SD 149.0 ± 40.2 70.6 ± 33.7 111.7 ± 33.1 54.0 ± 8.3

3D 5× k-t pre-Gd mean ± SD 142.9 ± 35.4 70.0 ± 28.8 108.2 ± 31.1 52.0 ± 8.1
Bias (95% C.I.) 6.1 (-20.9; 33.2) 0.6 (-19.0; 20.3) 3.5 (-11.3; 18.4) 2.0 (-3.5; 7.4)
Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.) 0.92 (0.87–0.98) 0.95 (0.92–0.98) 0.97 (0.94–0.99) 0.92 (0.86–0.98)

3D 5× k-t post-Gd mean ± SD 144.3 ± 37.4 71.4 ± 32.3 110.0 ± 32.2 52.0 ± 8.4
Bias (95% C.I.) 4.7 (-12.7; 22.1) -0.8 (-10.8; 9.2) 1.7 (-11.0; 14.4) 2.0 (-3.1; 7.1)
Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.) 0.97 (0.94–0.99) 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 0.98 (0.96–1.00) 0.93 (0.87–0.98)