Table 3.

Comparison of 2D reference against 3D 7× k-t SENSE and 3D 10× k-t SENSE images (n = 6).

	LV EDV (ml)	LV ESV (ml)	LV mass (g)	LVEF (%)
2D mean ± SD	145.8 ± 25.9	63.3 ± 19.1	95.4 ± 18.1	57.2 ± 5.9
3D 7× k-t mean ± SD	138.3 ± 26.2	62.3 ± 20.5	90.9 ± 18.6	60.9 ± 10.7
Bias (95% C.I.)	7.4 (-14.6; 29.4)	1.1 (-12.8; 14.9)	4.4 (-14.4; 23.3)	-3.7 (-26.7; 19.4)
Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.)	0.87 (0.64–1.00)	0.96 (0.88–1.00)	0.84 (0.56–1.00)	0.88 (0.67–1.00)
3D 10× k-t mean ± SD	134.3 ± 25.8	63.9 ± 22.0	92.7 ± 17.2	53.7 ± 8.0
Bias (95% C.I.)	11.5 (-16.1; 39.0)	-0.6 (-20.1; 18.9)	2.7 (-13.5; 18.9)	3.6 (-1.7; 8.8)
Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.)	0.77 (0.41–1.00)	0.89 (0.69–1.00)	0.88 (0.67–1.00)	0.81 (0.58–1.00)