Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2008 Feb 16;35(1):26–40. doi: 10.1007/s12160-007-9010-y

Table 2.

Overview of primary study outcomes of cognitive-behavioral stress management interventions for persons living with HIV

Study outcome Number of interventions assessing outcome Positive findings: study citation numbers Mixed findings: study citation numbers Negative findings: study citation numbers
Stress and coping
  Perceived stress 4 [31, 39] [28, 29/30]
  Coping strategies 8 [27, 28, 31, 32/33, 40, 41, 42, 45]
  Coping self-efficacy 3 [31, 40] [29/30]
Psychological adjustment and psychosocial functioning
  Depression 10 [26, 27, 35, 47, 48] [32/33, 38, 40, 46, 49]
  Anxiety 7 [23, 47, 48, 50] [29/30] [26, 35]
  Global psychological functioning and symptom levels 12 [31, 32, 38, 40, 42, 4648, 51, 52] [26, 34]
  Social support 8 [29/30, 41] [28, 40, 51] [26, 31, 33]
  Quality of life 4 [35] [34, 37, 52]
Health status markers
  Stress hormones 1 [39/47]
  CD4 counts 5 [33, 34, 36, 42, 48]
  Natural killer cells and naïve T cells 2 [56] [25]
  Cytotoxic T cells 2 [39] [48]

When multiple papers from the same intervention reported on an outcome, this is denoted by a “/” between study citation numbers. Positive findings indicate that participants in the stress management intervention demonstrated improved functioning on the outcome. Mixed findings indicate that while stress management participants reported some improvement, findings varied across assessment points or on different dimensions of the construct. Negative findings indicate that participants in the stress management condition did not demonstrate improvement on a particular outcome.