Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Struct Biol. 2008 Apr 22;164(1):7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.04.006

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Strategy to evaluate algorithms used to denoise a noisy tomogram Y containing n 2D slices (A), i.e., Y=(Yi)i=1n, where the index i represents the ith 2D slice in the noisy tomogram. Ŷ is the subset of Y, which is selected from a comparable region of each tomographic slice that contains no cells and hence no biological data (black box, enlarged on right). N represents the tomographic noise (N = Y − X, where X denotes the denoised tomogram). is the subset of N similar to Ŷ, where no biological data exists. A Gaussian fit computed with the shown mean and variance to the noise samples in Ŷ is shown on lower right (representative slice). Scale bar: 100 nm (B) Iterative process to identify the best denoising algorithm with optimized parameters, for a particular tomogram. Quantitative assessment was performed using analysis such as the KL-distance based GOF test, Fourier Ring Correlation and Single-Image SNR (see Methods for details).