Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):403–421. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.403

Table 1.

Empirical Data: Correlations Among Eight Measures of Immune Response (N = 72)

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. NK100 —
2. NK50 .902 —
3. NK25 .756 .862 —
4. NK12 .772 .891 .930 —
5. IFN50 .114 .125 .147 .123 —
6. IFN25 .095 .099 .114 .094 .959 —
7. IFN12 .103 .111 .132 .115 .933 .988 —
8. IFN6 .105 .104 .108 .092 .910 .981 .987 —

Note. The last two numbers in the variable name refer to the first two numbers in the effector:target ratio. Thus, IFN12 represents the E:T ratio of 12.5:1 for rIFNγ. NK = natural killer; IFN = interferon.