Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):403–421. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.403

Table 6.

Empirical Data: Transformed Residual Matrix E* and Residual Matrix E

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. NK100 −.024 .558 −.223 −.271 −.028 .023 −.124 .133
2. NK50 .115 −.076 −.204 −.132 −.016 .020 −.117 .112
3. NK25 −.039 −.022 .058 .282 .052 −.008 .080 −.116
4. NK12 −.038 −.010 .020 .046 −.008 −.049 .123 −.076
5. IFN50 −.004 −.001 .006 −.001 .009 .560 −.174 −.404
6. IFN25 .002 .001 .000 −.002 .022 −.166 −.177 −.113
7. IFN12 −.006 −.004 .002 .002 −.006 −.001 .030 .300
8. IFN6 .012 .007 −.005 −.003 −.022 −.002 .003 .137

Note. E* is shown above and including the diagonal, and E (from Table 3) is shown below the diagonal, for comparative purposes. The last two numbers in the variable name refer to the first two numbers in the effector:target ratio. Thus, IFN12 represents the E:T ratio of 12.5:1 for rIFNγ. NK = natural killer; IFN = interferon.