Table 2.
Genotype or Pre-treatment | Treatment | Macrophagesb | Neutrophilsb | Ifnγc | Tnfαc | Mip-2c | Mcp-1c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cKeap1-WT | Veh | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 16.0 ± 5.2 | 10.2 ± 0.6 | 102.3 ± 56. 7 | 29.1 ± 3.9 |
ConA | 19.2 ± 1.9 * | 14.5 ± 0.5 * | |||||
cKeap1-KO | Veh | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.4 ** | 2.8 ± 1.3 ** | 1.4 ± 0.7 ** | 2.7 ± 1.2 ** |
ConA | 8.1 ± 0.2 ^ | 2.4 ± 0.4 | |||||
Nrf2-WT + Veh | Veh | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 18.2 ± 5.4 | 26.0 ± 3.3 | 286.6 ± 87.5 | 66.1 ± 10.6 |
ConA | 16.3 ± 1.2 * | 8.1 ± 0.7 * | |||||
Nrf2-WT + CDDO-Im | Veh | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.4 ¶ | 2.5 ± 0.6 ¶ | 1.1 ± 0.2 ¶ | 2.4 ± 0.3 ¶ |
ConA | 4.8 ± 0.3 ^ | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
Livers were harvested 24-hr following ConA administration. Values represent the mean ± SE (Nrf2-WT, N = 5; cKeap1-KO/ cKeap1-WT; N = 3)
Data are expressed as cells/field
Gene transcript levels are expressed as relative fold-change (ConA/Veh)
p < 0.05 compared to all groups within genotype, ANOVA-SNK multiple comparisons
p < 0.05 compared to ConA treated group within genotype, ANOVA-SNK multiple comparisons
p < 0.05 compared to cKeap1-WT, Student’s t-test
p < 0.05 compared to Nrf2-WT + Veh, Student’s t-test