Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2007 Oct 26;53(1):159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.011

Table 3.

Performance differences for cognitive tasks for each drug challenge by treatment type and age group with standard errors. Numbers represent difference scores (cholinergic drug minus placebo). Significant effects of estradiol treatment and age are indicated. See text for cholinergic challenge effects.

Cognitive Construct Task Dependent Variable Age Group 2.5 µg/kg SCOP + E2 2.5 µg/kg SCOP + PLC 20 mg MECA + E2 20 mg MECA + PLC
Attention
CFF
Total (Hz) Young −.76 (.73) −1.45 (.52) 1.77 (1.05) .81 (.51)
Old −.72 (.76) −.62 (.52) 1.39 (1.05) 1.11 (.54)
Ascending (Hz) Young −.55 (.96) −1.03 (.60) 1.37 (.60) .28 (.60)
Old .31 (1.0) −.42 (.60) .33 (.60) .88 (.63)
Descending (Hz) Young −1.35 (.62) −1.54 (.62) .44 (.55) .26 (.55)
Old −1.47 (.62) −1.04 (.62) .35 (.55) .47 (.58)
CRT
Total (ms) Young 43.73 (26.1) 22.95 (26.1) 11.31 (25.9) 39.23 (25.5)
Old 39.56 (26.1) 65.51 (26.1) 86.51 (25.9) 30.32 (25.8)
Recognition RT (ms) Young 11.83 (15.5) 19.64 (15.5) 2.53 (12.0) −1.75 (14.2)
Old 16.37 (15.5) 41.24 (15.5) −15.56 (13.4) −1.44 (12.6)
Motor RT (ms) Young 18.24 (20.2) −8.77 (20.2) 14.38 (20.1) 25.07 (20.1)
Old −5.35 (20.2) 16.81 (20.2) 61.03 (20.1) 29.56 (20.1)
CPT
Hits (proportion correct) Young −2.89 (2.4) −5.18 (1.5) −.01 (1.38) −.55 (.4)
Old .86 (2.4) −1.49 (1.5) 0.82 (1.26) .18 (0.4)
Errors of Omission (number of errors) Young 2.89 (2.4) 4.91 (1.5) −.21 (1.4) .55 (.4)
Old −.89 (2.4) 1.58(1.5) −.91 (1.3) −.18 (.4)
Errors of Comission (number of errors) Young 1.3 (0.5) .91 (.5) .85 (.4) −.27 (.3)
Old .10 (0.5) 1.10 (.5) −.27 (.3) .18 (.3)
Hit RT (ms) Young 52.49 (18.2) 12.29 (17.3) 22.46 (19.3) 18.99 (17.4)
Old −14.49 (18.2) −43.90 (18.2) 7.78 (17.4) −8.48 (17.4)
Verbal Memory
SRT
Total Recall (number correct)1 Young −13.55 (3.6) −20.00 (3.6) −2.64 (2.7) −7.18 (2.7)
Old −16.00 (3.6) −7.55 (3.6) −5.73 (2.7) −2.55 (2.7)
Recall Consistency (number correct)2 Young −11.91 (3.6) −19.9 (3.6) −1.45 (3.1) −8.36 (3.1)
Old −15.73 (3.6) −5.73 (3.6) −6.54 (3.1) −2.18 (3.1)
Recall Failure (number of failures)3 Young 11.08 (2.9) 16.82 (4.1) 3.01 (2.4) 3.73 (2.4)
Old 13.00 (2.9) 7.00 (4.1) 3.36 (2.4) 3.00 (2.4)
PR
NYU Scoring (number correct) Young −.15 (0.04) −.05 (.07) −.05 (0.1) .01 (.1)
Old −.02 (0.04) .05 (.07) .003 (.1) .07 (0.1)
1

SCOP analysis age and treatment interaction for total recall: F(1,20) = 10.73, p < .01

2

SCOP analysis age and treatment interaction for recall consistency: F(1,20) = 17.44, p < .001

3

SCOP analysis age and treatment interaction for recall failure: F(1,20) = 5.57, p < .05