Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 May;85(5):1275–1285. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1275

TABLE 2.

Laboratory values in men who developed signs of organ dysfunction while consuming a diet providing 550 mg choline · 70 kg−1 · d−11

Test and dietary phase Value (n = 6)
Ratio of liver fat to spleen fat
    Screening 1.6 ± 0.4
    550 mg choline 1.9 ± 0.7
    Repletion 1.5 ± 0.2
Serum AST (U/L)
    Screening 26 ± 1.5
    550 mg choline 135 ± 372
    Repletion 30 ± 3
Serum ALT (U/L)
    Screening 30 ± 4
    550 mg choline 58 ± 102
    Repletion 48 ± 52
Serum CPK (U/L)
    Screening 115 ± 17
    550 mg choline 9081 ± 33812
    Repletion 188 ± 31
Serum albumin (mg/dL)
    Screening 4.3 ± 0.1
    550 mg choline 4.0 ± 0.13
    Repletion 4.0 ± 0.13
Plasma choline (nmol/mL)
    Screening 9.3 ± 0.9
    550 mg choline 9.9 ± 1.0
    Repletion 10.4 ± 1.0
Plasma betaine (nmol/mL)
    Screening 40 ± 6
    550 mg choline 65 ± 112
    Repletion 50 ± 5
Plasma phosphatidylcholine (nmol/mL)
    Screening 2305 ± 178
    550 mg choline 1910 ± 1743
    Repletion 1949 ± 127
1

All values are ± SE. For some time points, n was smaller than indicated because of missing data (see text). Prestudy (screening) values were obtained on day 1 of the 550-mg choline diet to determine the ratio of liver fat to spleen fat; all other laboratory variables were measured during the screening visit. For all variables, measurements were also conducted at the end of the 550-mg choline diet phase and at the end of the repletion phase. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CPK, creatine phosphokinase. The variables selected for inclusion in this table were identified after examination of 50 P values; ie, 42 of the 50 laboratory variables studied with the use of linear statistical models did not show clinically meaningful or significant changes at an α level of 0.05 and are not presented in the table. Statistical significance was conducted by using F tests, which were performed via a closed procedure (31) for testing multiple hypotheses, to determine differences obtained by fitting unified linear mixed-effects models to the data in appropriate scales.

2,3 Significantly different from screening:

2

P < 0.01

3

P < 0.05.