Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul;10(4):311–316. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070149

Table 3.

Recovery Efficiency Compared with Manual and Between EZ1 Viral Kits

Serial dilutions
A. Compared to Manual
 BP-BAL
  Sample 10−1 10−2 10−3*
  Manual 100 100 100
  EZ1 102 99 102
  easyMag 103 100 100
 Mpn-ETT
  Sample 10−1 10−2 10−3*
  Manual 100 100 100
  EZ1 95 94 95
  easyMag 92 86 n/a
 BK-Plasma
  Sample 10−1 10−2 10−3*
  Manual 100 100 100
  EZ1 103 108 105
  easyMag 103 108 102
 HSVII-CSF EZ1 viral kit version 1.0
  Sample 10−1 10−2 10−3*
  Manual 100 100 100
  EZ1 103 95 96
  easyMAG 103 104 100
B. EZ1 viral kit version 1.0 versus 2.0
 EV-CSF EZ1 viral kit version 1.0
  Sample 10−1 10−2 10−3*
  Manual 100 100 100
  EZ1 83 85 87
  easyMAG 97 97 96
 EV-CSF EZ1 viral kit version 2.0
  Sample 10−1 10−2 10−3*
  Manual 100 100 100
  EZ1 97 98 101
  easyMAG 94 95 97

HSVII-CSF, herpes simplex virus II-cerebrospinal fluid; EV, Enterovirus coxsackie A9.

*

10−3 dilution represents a Ct of approximately 35.

n/a indicates that no samples were positive at that dilution, so recovery efficiency could not be calculated.