Skip to main content
. 2008 May 14;105(20):7182–7187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801864105

Table 1.

Comparison with published kinetic folding rates

Construct λ1, s−1 A1 (lag) λ2, s−1 A2 λ3, s−1 A3 λ4, s−1 A4
H124L 38 ± 9 −0.07 ± 0.01 6.2 ± 0.3 0.53 ± 0.01 0.93 ± 0.07 0.22 ± 0.01 0.025 ± 0.001 0.17 ± 0.003
Pro- 99 ± 15 −0.08 ± 0.01 7.8 ± 0.4 0.69 ± 0.03 2.3 ± 0.2 0.24 ± 0.03
Pro- 134 ± 21 −11.3 ± 0.1% 17.2 ± 0.5 57.3 ± 0.9% 4.7 ± 0.1 35.3 ± 1.1% 0.82 ± 0.04 4.5 ± 0.2%
WT*§ 40.6 −0.23 10.4 1.78 1.35 0.4 0.1 0.26
WT*/Trp76§ 41.3 −0.32 11.3 1.51 2.3 0.43 0.01 0.24
P117G/H124L 47 ± 3 −0.10 ± 0.01 9.7 ± 0.2 0.63 ± 0.01 2.4 ± 0.1 0.17 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.04 0.12 ± 0.01
P117G/H124L 200 ± 41 −0.016 ± 0.002 13.5 ± 0.2 0.26 ± 0.003 2.4 ± 0.1 0.153 ± 0.003

Values listed are at zero denaturant.

Unfold at pH 2.2, measure folding at pH 5.3, 15°C, 0.1 M sodium acetate (27).

Unfold at pH 2.0, measure folding at pH 6.0, 20°C, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 2 mM EGTA (12). “%” denotes relative amplitudes.

§Unfold at pH 2.0, measure folding at pH 5.2, 15°C, 0.1 M sodium acetate (26). WT* is SNase P47G/P117G/H124L.

This work. Same conditions as †.

This work. Unfold at pH 2.2, measure folding at pH 8.5, 50 mM CHES, 20°C, 0.1 M NaCl.