Table 5.
Quantitative angiographic analysis of the side branch
Classical crush | DK crush | P Overall classical vs. DK crush | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Without final kissing balloon | With final kissing balloon | |||
No. of lesions | 135 | 30 | 105 | 130 | |
Baseline | |||||
RVD (mm) | 2·45 ± 0·45 | 2·45 ± 0·33 | 2·49 ± 0·48 | 2·46 ± 0·54 | 0·5 |
MLD (mm) | 0·84 ± 0·51 | 0·83 ± 0·55 | 0·85 ± 0·59 | 0·84 ± 0·58 | 0·4 |
DS (%) | 65·7 ± 18·9 | 62·4 ± 17·5 | 66·3 ± 19·2 | 65·4 ± 19·8 | 0·3 |
Post-PCI | |||||
RVD (mm) | 2·85 ± 0·39 | 2·85 ± 0·36 | 2·86 ± 0·39 | 2·88 ± 0·40 | 0·13 |
MLD (mm) | 2·56 ± 0·42 | 2·18 ± 0·46 | 2·59 ± 0·49 | 2·59 ± 0·45 | 0·8 |
DS (%) | 19·4 ± 8·7 | 22·6 ± 9·2 | 15·5 ± 9·1 | 14·6 ± 8·7 | 0·04 |
Acute gain (mm) | 1·45 ± 0·59 | 1·37 ± 0·57* | 1·64 ± 0·55 | 1·69 ± 0·64 | 0·01 |
8-month follow-up | |||||
RVD (mm) | 2·81 ± 0·41 | 2·80 ± 0·37 | 2·83 ± 0·42 | 2·82 ± 0·54 | 0·7 |
MLD (mm) | 1·95 ± 0·45 | 1·52 ± 0·50* | 2·24 ± 0·52 | 2·29 ± 0·71 | 0·8 |
DS (%) | 38·6 ± 17·5 | 39·4 ± 17·7* | 23·9 ± 14·6 | 21·2 ± 14·5 | 0·03 |
Late loss (mm) | 0·48 ± 0·28 | 0·51 ± 0·39* | 0·34 ± 0·23 | 0·33 ± 0·25 | 0·04 |
Restenosis (%) | |||||
Overall | 24·4 | 36·6 | 20·9** | 12·3 | 0·01 |
Edge† | 17·8 | 33·3 | 13·3 | 7·7 | 0·01 |
In-stent | 6·6 | 3·3 | 7·6 | 4·6 | 0·08 |
Abbreviations: RVD, reference vessel diameter; MLD, minimum lumen diameter; DS, diameter stenosis; DK, double kissing.
P < 0·001 comparing classical crush without final kissing inflations to both classical crush with final kissing inflations as well as DK crush.
P = 0·01 comparing classical crush with final kissing inflations to DK crush.
indicates the restenosis at ostial side branch (within 5 mm proximal to side stent).