Table 2.
Fragment | Size, kb | Band | Size, kb |
---|---|---|---|
A | 364 | 1 | 1378 |
B | 302 | 2 | 1579 |
C | 287 | 3 | 330 |
D | 287 | 4 | 256 |
E | 259 | 5 | 173 |
F | 210 | 6 | 119 |
G | 198 | 7 | 75 |
H | 189 | 8 | 67 |
I | 187 | 9 | 6 |
J | 172 | 10 | 5 |
K | 150 | ||
L | 150 | ||
M | 143 | ||
N | 138 | ||
O | 113 | ||
P | 113 | ||
Q | 104 | ||
R | 84 | ||
S | 75 | ||
T | 71 | ||
U | 71 | ||
V | 65 | ||
W | 58 | ||
X | 46 | ||
Y | 40 | ||
Z | 31 | ||
AA | 22 | ||
BB | 21 | ||
CC | 12 | ||
DD | 9 | ||
EE | 8 | ||
FF | 5 | ||
GG | 4 | ||
Total | 3988 |
The sizes of bands one and two were determined by summation of their SfiI fragments. The mobility of band 2 in the I-CeuI digestion is aberrant relative to the other fragments because of the covalently closed circular nature of this species.