Table 1.

Summary of 19 tiny ruptured ACoA aneurysm treated with endovascular treatment

Patient			Aneurysm			Coils (no. × mm)a	Angiographic occlusion	Complication	Follow-up
No.	Age (years)	Sex	Hunt & Hess grade	Size (mm)	Dome/neck ratio				Angiographic		Clinical
									Period (months)	Recanalization	Period (months)	Outcome (mRS score)
1	56	M	2	3×3×2.5	1.3	3×40, 2×30	Complete	None	72	−	84	0
2	58	F	2	3×3×3	1.2	3×60, 2×20	Near-complete	None	64	+	80	0
3	51	M	1	3×2.5×2.5	1.4	2×60, 2×30, 2×20	Complete	None	60	−	60	0
4	89	F	3	2.5×2×2	1.5	2×60	Complete	None	NA	−	36	4
5	82	F	2	2.5×2.5×2	1.7	2×60	Complete	None	48	+	75	2
6	50	M	4	3×3×3	1.1	3×40, 2×40, 2×20	Complete	None	52	−	70	1
7	44	F	1	3×2.5×3	1.6	3×60, 2×40	Complete	None	48	−	64	0
8	58	F	3	3×3×3	1.8	3×60, 2×40, 2×10	Complete	None	40	−	40	2
9	66	M	3	3×2.5×2.5	1.9	2.5×60, 2×30, 2×10	Near-complete	None	36	−	58	1
10	79	F	2	2.5×2×2	1.1	2×60	Complete	None	48	−	48	1
11	78	M	1	3×2.5×2.5	1.5	3×60, 2×60	Complete	None	36	−	39	0
12	53	M	2	2.5×2.5×2	1.2	2.5×60, 2×30	Complete	None	37	−	37	0
13	84	F	3	3×2.5×2.5	1.8	3×60, 2×20, 2×10	Complete	None	NA	−	24	5
14	53	M	1	3×2×2	2.1	2×60, 2×40	Complete	None	36	−	36	0
15	52	F	3	2×2×2	1.4	2×40, 2×30	Complete	None	27	−	30	0
16	66	M	3	3×2.5×2.5	2.0	3×40, 2×20, 2×10	Complete	None	25	−	30	1
17	83	F	4	3×3×3	1.7	3×40, 2×40	Complete	None	24	−	27	3
18	47	F	4	3×2.5×3	1.9	3×80	Complete	None	NA	−	NA	6
19	90	F	2	2.5×2×2	1.7	2×40, 2×20	Near-complete	None	16	−	17	2

NA not avairable

^aAll coils used were GDC-10 Soft or GDC-10 Ultrasoft.