Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Reprod Immunol. 2007 Oct 24;78(1):58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2007.08.004

Table II.

Effect of depletion of Gr-1+ cells on protection mediated by passive transfer of HSV-specific polyclonal antibodies or monoclonal anti-gD2 10E4.2G2a antibodies

Titer (PFU/ mg tissue)
Depletiona HSV-specific Ab Transferredb Incidencec Lumbosacral ganglia Spinal Cord
A
Anti- Gr-1+ Polyclonal Ab 7 \ 11 754 +/− 502 616 +/− 162
Control IgG Polyclonal Ab 3 \ 11 d 130 +/− 129 155 +/− 152
Anti- Gr-1+ None (PBS) 6 \ 6e 1087 +/− 518 903 +/− 249
B
Anti- Gr-1+ 10E4.2G2a 1 \ 14d 49 +/− 49d 45 +/− 45 d
Control IgG 10E4.2G2a 0 \ 14 d 0d 0 d
Anti- Gr-1+ None (PBS) 12 \ 12 3475 +/− 723 1159 +/− 231
a

Rag 1 −/− mice were depleted of Gr-1+ cells by in vivo treatment with RB6.8C5 antibody or treated with an isotype control antibody of irrelevant specificity.

b

Mice received either 50µg HSV-specific polyclonal Ab (A), 50µg 10E4.2IgG2a antibody (B), or PBS as a control 2 days prior to ivag inoculation of 5×103 PFU HSV-2 strain 186. Lumbosacral ganglia and spinal cords were sampled on day 8 post inoculation.

c

Results are expressed as the number of samples containing infectious virus per total number of samples. Results were pooled from 2 experiments of identical design.

d

p<0.05 compared to PBS-treated Gr-1 depleted mice, 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test.

e

Four PBS treated, anti-Gr-1 treated mice died prior to tissue sampling and were not included in the analysis.