Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Mar 2;118(2):181–191. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.02.003

Table 1.

Putative natural therapeutic products for T2D

Effectiveness rating (1)
Product Possibly Effective Possibly Ineffective Likely Ineffective Insufficient Data
Alcohol X
Aloe gel X
Alpha-lipoic acid X
Ascorbic acid X
Banaba X
Beta-carotene X
Biotin X
Bitter melon X
Branched-chain amino acids X
Buckwheat X
Caffeine X
Calcium X
Cinnamomum cassia X
Chromium X
Coenzyme Q10 X
Cranberry X
Diacylglycerol X
Docosahexaenoic acid X
Eicosapentaenoic acid X
Eugenia jambolana X
Fenugreek X
Fig X
Fish oil X
Garlic X
Ginseng X
Ginkgo biloba X
Glucomannan X
Guar gum X
Gymnema sylvestre X
Holy basil X
Ivy gourd X
Lutein X
Lycopene X
Magnesium X
Maitake mushroom X
Milk thistle X
Niacin / niacinamide X
Oat bran X
Olive X
Prickly pear cactus X
Psyllium seed husk (blonde) X
Salacia X
Table X continued
Soy X
Stevia X
Tomato X
Vanadium X
Vitamin D X
Vitamin E X
Wheat bran X
Xanthan gum X

Note:

(1)

Ratings are defined as follows: possibly effective = reputable references suggest that the product might work for the given indication based on one or more clinical trials giving positive results for clinically relevant end-points; possibly ineffective = reputable references suggest that the product might not work for the given indication based on one human study giving negative results for clinically relevant end-points; likely ineffective = reputable references generally agree that the product is not effective for the given indication, based on two or more randomized, controlled, clinical trials giving negative results for clinically relevant end-points and published in established, refereed journals.

The effectiveness ratings come from the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database (www.naturaldatabase.com) accessed on 29 July 2006, copyright © 1995-2006, Therapeutic Research Faculty (all rights reserved). Used with permission.