Table 1.
Evaluation domains and data collection methods: triangulation of data sources
Evaluation domain | Indicator(s) | Household survey | Facility survey | Exit survey | Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews | Retail census | Voucher tracking | Cost analysis |
Coverage of target groups (ownership, use) | Household ownership of at least one net/ITN; Individual slept under a net/ITN the night prior to the survey* | X | X | X | ||||
Provision and use of RCH services, including voucher scheme | Currently pregnant woman/recently pregnant woman**attended ANC; Mean weeks of gestation at time of first ANC visit; Received a voucher; Received 1 dose of SP as IPTp; Received 2 doses of SP as IPTp | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Leakage of vouchers | % of voucher recipients who could be identified, interviewed, and confirmed they received a voucher | X | X | |||||
Impact on ITN market | Percent of wards with at least one retail source of ITNs, insecticide | X | X | |||||
Cost and cost-effectiveness | Cost per voucher delivered Cost per ITN delivered | X | X |
* ITN use measured in all household members, currently pregnant women, children under 5 years.
** Indicators of voucher coverage were calculated for both currently pregnant women and for women who had a live birth in the 12 months preceding the survey.
ITN = Insecticide-treated net; RCH = Reproductive and child health; ANC = Antenatal care; SP = sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine; IPTp = Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy