Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 6;9:268. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-268

Table 1.

Comparison of biological coherence of clusters obtained for dataset I by different clustering algorithms

Proportion of Genes (%) in Clusters of p-values

Average Correlation <= 10-4 <= 10-3
(Clustering Method) EP_GOS_Clust 0.617 32.8* 64.9*
Iterated EP_GOS_Clust 0.685* > 69* > 90*
KMedians 0.615 30.8 62.2*
KCityBlk 0.398 27.5 56.7
KCorr 0.630* 32.6* 60.1
KMeans 0.614 25.1 55.2
KAvePair 0.567 25.2 54.4
QTClust 0.572 31.1 56.9
SOTA 0.604 30.2 58.9
SOM 0.623* 30.5 59.2

Shown are the comparative biological coherence formed by various clustering methods on dataset I. The 2 shaded rows represent clustering done by the standalone EP_GOS_Clust backbone and the proposed iterative approach.

* The top three performers in each category are indicated with an asterisk.