Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):534–541. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2404

Table 2.

Table 2 Factor Loadings of Six-factor Solution for Admission Note (n = 67; Overall Internal Consistency Reliability: 0.86)

Item Factor I Factor II Factor III Factor IV Factor V Factor VI
1. Clear 0.687
2. Up-to-date 0.740
3. Complete 0.584
4. Legible 0.866
5. Accurate 0.840
6. Thorough 0.589
7. Uncluttered 0.660
8. Coherent 0.890
9. Useful 0.704
10. Correct 0.785
11. Brief 0.805
12. Current 0.932
13. Organized 0.585
14. Relevant 0.863
15. Comprehensible 0.665
16. Concise 0.800
17. Structured 0.406
18. Nonredundant 0.463
19. Succinct 0.803
20. Synthesized 0.810
21. Focused 0.643
22. Consistent 0.730
Internal consistency reliability estimate (alpha) 0.88 0.73 0.78 0.52 0.70 N/A
Percent variance explained after Varimax rotation 21% 16% 11% 9.9% 8.5% 6.6%