Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Vis Image Underst. 2007 Sep;107(3):160–182. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.005

Table 2.

The mean and standard deviation (in parenthesis) of the similarity measure IRFC−FOMBNIT, T ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, are shown for each blur, noise, and inhomogeneity condition.

B1N1I1 98.93(0.31) B2N1I1 98.38(0.37) B3N1I1 97.30(0.46)
B1N1I2 98.08(0.39) B2N1I2 96.78(0.40) B3N1I2 93.12(0.42)
B1N1I3 97.91(0.42) B2N1I3 94.49(0.34) B3N1I3 90.42(0.50)
B1N2I1 97.90(0.38) B2N2I1 95.91(0.29) B3N2I1 91.73(0.49)
B1N2I2 96.65(0.45) B2N2I2 90.60(0.40) B3N2I2 85.89(0.53)
B1N2I3 94.40(0.42) B2N2I3 87.41(0.38) B3N2I3 82.81(0.50)
B1N3I1 97.34(0.40) B2N3I1 92.62(0.35) B3N3I1 87.69(0.56)
B1N3I2 93.80(0.46) B2N3I2 86.70(0.42) B3N3I2 82.09(0.48)
B1N3I3 90.50(0.49) B2N3I3 83.30(0.46) B3N3I3 78.90(0.55)