Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Jan 22;34(5):834–840. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.10.016

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A: Number of regions containing extravasations as a function of ultrasound frequency. B: The density of extravasations vs. frequency. This density was defined as the number of areas with extravasation divided by πr2, where r is the half width of beam plots measured in water with a needle hydrophone. Lower ultrasound frequencies had fewer cells per unit area on average, but substantial variation was present. C: MRI contrast enhancement. Mean ± standard deviation shown.