Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Ecol. 2006 Dec;15(14):4623–4634. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03112.x

Table 3.

R2 and P associated with linear regression models of four diversity estimators in Helianthus paradoxus. The models take into account the strength of selection on QTLs and distance of markers from the putative selected sites to better account for differences in variability among microsatellite loci, either with the initial microsatellite classes (upper rows) or with the blind-test markers only (lower rows)

He Rs ln RH ANN ln RH PET ln RV ANN ln RV PET
All markers R2 0.112 0.096 0.142 0.099 0.399 0.13
P 0.046 0.066 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
blind-test markers R2 0.315 0.155 0.383 0.487 0.519 0.635
P 0.004 0.024 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001