Table 2.
BRCA1 | BRCA2 | PROS | PROS-OUT | |||||
DP | Others | DP | Others | DP | Others | DP | Others | |
More correlated | 18/18 | 16.67/18 | 17/17 | 16.5/17 | 59/60 | 53.3/60 | 12/15 | 11.83/15 |
Less correlated | 3/4 | 1.67/4 | 4/5 | 1.67/5 | 34/41 | 21.67/41 | 3/6 | 0.9/6 |
DLBCL-FL | ALL-AML | I2000 | ||||||
DP | Others | DP | Others | DP | Others | |||
More correlated | 62/62 | 58.33/62 | 38/38 | 34.67/38 | 58/58 | 57.83/58 | ||
Less correlated | 12/15 | 9.17/15 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 1.5/4 |
The first subset includes those test feature vectors that are more correlated to the samples of the correct class (called, more correlated in this table). The second subset consists of those test feature vectors that are more correlated to the samples of the incorrect class (referred to as less correlated). The proposed approach is superior in both subsets, but especially so in the less correlated category. This is achieved by taking advantage of the information encoded in the test sample.